Ramaphosa says firing Mchunu based on untested allegations would be unfair, 'create a dangerous precedent'
President Cyril Ramaphosa came to the defence of Mchunu in the National Assembly on Wednesday afternoon, as well as his decision to order a commission of inquiry into allegations of corruption within the police and interference by Mchunu.
President Cyril Ramaphosa delivered the budget vote address for the Presidency in the Good Hope Chamber of Parliament on 16 July 2025. Picture: GCIS
CAPE TOWN - President Cyril Ramaphosa said that he could not take punitive steps against suspended police minister, Senzo Mchunu, on the basis of untested allegations.
He came to the defence of Mchunu in the National Assembly on Wednesday afternoon, as well as his decision to order a commission of inquiry into allegations of corruption within the police and interference by Mchunu.
Delivering his budget vote address in the House, Ramaphosa said it was untrue that commissions of inquiry did not result in tangible actions.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa says National Dialogue not 'just about talking', expects it to 'produce real results'
President Ramaphosa has given the directive for two commissions of inquiry in recent weeks - one into the alleged interference in the prosecution of truth and reconciliation cases, and the other into alleged collusion and infiltration within the SAPS.
Responding to criticism to launch an inquiry to investigate claims made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, Ramaphosa said that while the allegations were serious, they were untested.
"It is therefore necessary that we establish the facts through an independent, credible process so that we can ensure accountability and safeguard public confidence in the police service."
Ramaphosa also responded to calls for Mchunu to be fired based on Mkhwanazi’s allegations and misleading Parliament.
"Not only would this be unfair, but it would create a dangerous precedent."
He said the view that commissions of inquiry did not produce meaningful results was wrong and not borne out by evidence.