Menstruation stigma allows harmful products to slip through cracks

The stigma around menstruation does not just shame people, but it also affects regulation, research funding and accountability. 

A study by the University of Free State found that 16 sanitary pad and pantyliner brands tested contained at least two endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), raising concerns about consumer safety, transparency, and long-term exposure.

RELATED: Consumer Commission probes sanitary pad brands over harmful chemicals

Co-author of Flow and menstrual rights activist Pontsho Pilane explained that for generations, menstruation has been framed as unhygienic or shameful, which has led to a marketplace for these products to exist.

She added that period poverty has also limited consumers' choices for menstrual products.

“Menstrual products being marketed as being fresh and odourless shows a common problem that occurs with menstrual stigma, which is the idea of menstruation being dirty.

“The socio-economic stigma and the natural patriarchal stigma that exists around menstruation compound together, causing this idea of trying to conceal, hide, and having shame about periods and menstruation.”

Pilane argued that while regulations are important, destigmatising menstruation will eliminate the market for these products.

“It is not just a biological process; it is environmental, social, and political. When we look at menstruation through all these lenses, we can make sure that things like harmful products are not found in the manufacturing, that they are also affordable for different kinds of people and that we have different options for different people.”

To listen to Pilane in conversation with CapeTalk’s Lester Kiewit, use the audio player below: