State prosecutors and investigators' conduct under scrutiny after Cholota extradition overturned
On Tuesday, the Bloemfontein High Court ruled Cholota’s extradition from the United States (US) in 2024 was unlawful and unconstitutional, after she accused the state of submitting falsified documents to United States (US) authorities.
Fraud and corruption-accused Moroadi Cholota appeared in the Bloemfontein Magistrates Court on 12 August 2024. Picture: Xanderleigh Dookey Makhaza/EWN
BLOEMFONTEIN - The conduct of State prosecutors and investigators in the asbestos corruption trial is under scrutiny after Ace Magashule’s former Personal Assistant, Moroadi Cholota, was let off on a technicality.
On Tuesday, the Bloemfontein High Court ruled Cholota’s extradition from the United States (US) in 2024 was unlawful and unconstitutional, after she accused the state of submitting falsified documents to United States (US) authorities.
Cholota’s special plea saw the court hear arguments in a trial within a trial about the lawfulness of the extradition and the court’s jurisdiction to try her alongside her former boss and 16 others in the R255 million corruption case.
Tuesday’s judgment means Cholota will now be removed from the indictment.
During the court ruling, Judge Phillip Loubser said, “Consequently, I have to find that the prosecution has not found reasonable doubt or at all that there was a valid or lawful request from South Africa for the extradition of Ms Cholota from the United States. It follows that if there was no valid extradition request, then the extradition itself was without any basis and, therefore, unlawful.”
NPA national spokesperson Mthunzi Mhaga says the state prosecutors in the matter are yet to caucus on the judgment before deciding whether or not to appeal. The main trial is back tomorrow minus Moroadi Cholota. @khanya_mntambo https://t.co/NgE9rrpz6y pic.twitter.com/HFhuAwWx6S
— EWN Reporter (@ewnreporter) June 3, 2025