IDT CEO resignation revives scrutiny of alleged bribe to silence journalist

The sudden resignation of the Independent Development Trust’s (IDT) chief executive, Tebogo Malaka, has brought renewed attention to explosive allegations that an investigative journalist was offered money to make a corruption investigation disappear.

The saga centres on revelations that a senior IDT official and a representative were secretly recorded, allegedly offering a bribe to stop reporting on corruption at the state entity. The recordings, later made public, caused widespread shock and prompted formal investigations.

“Make it go away”

Investigative journalist Pieter-Louis Myburgh, who exposed the story, has said the alleged bribe was not limited to cash. According to him, the offer included access to IDT-linked contracts – a move that could have unlocked far greater financial benefits than the amount initially placed on the table.

He has described the approach as unusually brazen, even in an environment where journalists often face pressure, intimidation or subtle attempts to influence coverage.

Contracts under scrutiny

The investigation also raised red flags about a multi-million-rand public works contract awarded to a well-known foundation. Reports alleged that unemployed beneficiaries were short-changed or not paid at all, despite the scale of funding involved.

Myburgh has said that detailed questions sent to the foundation received only broad responses, doing little to dispel concerns.

Exit before discipline

The IDT CEO’s resignation came ahead of a scheduled disciplinary hearing. While stepping down is not an admission of guilt, the timing – and the absence of a financial settlement – has fuelled public speculation about why she chose to walk away.

For many observers, the resignation is seen as a rare moment of consequence in a corruption case that might otherwise have faded from view.

Pressure on investigators

The Hawks are investigating the alleged bribery, with the National Prosecuting Authority expected to decide whether charges will follow. Myburgh has warned that even strong evidence does not always translate into prosecutions.

He says the case now represents a test for law enforcement, with the public watching closely to see whether accountability goes beyond headlines and resignations.

For more information, listen to Myburgh using the audio player below: