Magudumana was paid for use of her archive material in Netflix doccie she's now challenging, court hears

Kgomotso Modise
11 September 2025 | 11:11Nandipha Magudumana and her accomplice, Thabo Bester, have approached the court for a temporary interdict of the production.
Nandipha Magudumana appeared at the the Bloemfontein High Court on 5 June 2024. Picture: Katlego Jiyane/Eyewitness News
JOHANNESBURG - It’s been revealed in the Pretoria High Court that Dr Nandipha Magudumana was paid by the production company behind the Netflix documentary that she is challenging.
Magudumana and her accomplice, Thabo Bester, have approached the court for a temporary interdict of the production.
Bester's lawyers have argued that the documentary creates the impression that he is guilty of the charges against him.
Bester, Magudumana and seven others are accused of planning and executing his brazen escape from the Mangaung prison, where he was serving a life sentence.
Dr Nandipha Magudumana’s lawyer, advocate Lerato Moela, told the Pretoria High Court that she signed an agreement with production company Storyscope, which she now believes is unenforceable.
Moela also argued that the contract was not signed by the authorising agent, making it invalid.
Representing Netflix, advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, argued that Magudumana had distorted the contents of the agreement.
He said that Magudumana was paid for the use of her archive material and was represented by her attorneys when she entered the agreement.
Happening Now:
— Kgomotso🌸 (@motso_modise) September 11, 2025
The Pretoria high court has just heard that Dr Nandipha Magudumana was paid for the use of her archive material in the Netflix documentary that she is now challenging.
Magudumana wants the release of the doccie interdicted. #ThaboBester pic.twitter.com/xnhyi1iquA
Summary:
— EWN Reporter (@ewnreporter) September 11, 2025
Magudumana signed a contract with the production company, Storyscope to provide archives for the Netflix doccie.
Her lawyers are now arguing that the contract is unemforceable because of some of the clauses.
They want a temporary interdict. @motso_modise
Get the whole picture 💡
Take a look at the topic timeline for all related articles.
Trending News
More in Local
14 September 2025 16:45
Madlanga Commission: Analysts dissect SAPS power struggle after Mkhwanazi’s claims
14 September 2025 14:05
Four dead in three separate incidents in Wallacedene, Kraaifontein
14 September 2025 12:51
Joburg dispatches additional water tankers to Westbury, Coronationville, reveals Morero